At 06:30 p.m. 11/10/2010, Robert Kern wrote:
On 10/11/10 6:17 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:11:37 -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
On 10/11/10 8:44 AM, Jason Swails wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Andreas Waldenburger
<use...@geekmail.invalid> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:51:46 +1300 Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
> In message<mailman.1417.1286438621.29448.python-l...@python.org
<mailto:mailman.1417.1286438621.29448.python-l...@python.org>>,
> Emile van Sebille wrote:
>
> > Oh come now -- isn't being lazy a primary programmer's
> > attribute?
>
> I wonder if thatâs why more men are good at it than women...
You may want to think about whether this really was your intended
meaning.
Sure it was -- men are lazy; programmers are primarily lazy; explains
why programmers are predominantly men (for the time being, at least).
Made perfect sense to me.
That's quite a different statement than "men are more good at it than
women".
But that's not what he said. He said more men are good at programming
than women.
I suck at reading, apparently.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt
to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I was a teacher of Computer Sciences for some
years.... in my case, women were better
programming than men..... but sure, on the IT
industry the percentage of men is a lot more than the one of women. Why?
Jorge Biquez
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
