Xah Lee wrote: > As part of this new syntax and purity, where everything in a program is > of Classes and Objects and Methods, many complex issues and concept > have arisen in OOP.
Yes and it is easy to communicate a class which represents some thing determined by object oriented analysis and can be graphed as an element of an UML diagram in your development team. This is simply the state of the art in the IT industry and if FP-people or followers of any other alternative programming style can communicate their concepts and design patterns via type-classes or parentheses as well or better than they will going to lead the dicourse and OO will fall apart. I'm just sceptical that this is going to happen. Kay -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
