On 27 set, 18:39, Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 27, 12:11 pm, namekuseijin <namekusei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 27 set, 16:06, Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> wrote:> 2010-09-27 > > > > > For instance, this is far more convenient: > > > > [x+1 for x in [1,2,3,4,5] if x%2==0] > > > > than this: > > > > map(lambda x:x+1,filter(lambda x:x%2==0,[1,2,3,4,5])) > > > > How about this: > > > [snip] > > > how about this: read before replying. > > hum??? > > i read your post quite carefully, and rather thought i replied well.
I don't think so. You completely missed the point where I agreed about filter map being more convenient when calling predefined functions and also the detailed explanation of why do in scheme is not imperative at all. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
