In article <mailman.583.1283975836.29448.python-l...@python.org>, Thomas Jollans <tho...@jollybox.de> wrote: > >Also, Python 2.5 is frightfully old. [...]
"Frightfully"??? I'm sure plenty of people are still using Python 2.3 in production environments (certainly my last job did as of 1.5 years ago, and I would be mildly surprised if they upgraded by now). -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ [on old computer technologies and programmers] "Fancy tail fins on a brand new '59 Cadillac didn't mean throwing out a whole generation of mechanics who started with model As." --Andrew Dalke -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
