On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:43:40 -0700, Baba wrote: > So here's my code. It does still cause me one headache. If i use f(0)=0 > and f(1)=1 as base cases the result will be 144. I was expecting the > result to be the next value in the series (233)...
That's because you're not generating the Fibonacci series, but a similar unnamed(?) series with the same recurrence but different starting conditions. The Fibinacci series starts with f(0)=1, f(1)=1. > If i use f(1)=1 and > f(2)=2 as base cases them i get my expected result. Which implies that f(0) must be 1, not 0. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
