wheres pythonmonks wrote:
How does "x is not None" make any sense? "not x is None" does make sense.
I can only surmise that in this context (preceding is) "not" is not a
unary right-associative operator, therefore:
x is not None === IS_NOTEQ(X, None)
Beside "not in" which seems to work similarly, is there other
syntactical sugar like this that I should be aware of?
W
x is not None === not (x is None).
"is not" is an operator, not the combination of 2.
JM
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
