In article <0ed1fb16-87cb-4fb9-85b2-08d876445...@q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sturlamolden <sturlamol...@yahoo.no> wrote:
> The typical examples revealing incompetence are use of > new[] instead of std::vector To be fair, there were usable C++ compilers before there were usable STL implementations. Thus, it should not be surprising to find older C++ code bases eschewing the use of STL. That's not to say that this trend should be propagated in current educational material. > and dynamic resourse allocation outside contructors. This one I don't understand. Yes, I get RAII, but surely there are valid reasons to allocate memory outside of constructors. Containers which resize themselves (such as std::vector) are one obvious example. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
