On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Albert Hopkins wrote: > C seems to be a good, portable language for writing interpreters and > compilers.
And one should not forget about performance. C++ was for a long time behind C, and even now some parts (like iostreams) should be avoided in fast code. BTW, C++ can be IMHO a bit tricky in situations when one would like to call back from JIT-generated code into parts written in C++... I mean things like virtual functions, overloading, code generated from templates, accessing private members etc. All those issues are non essential from the point of interpreting or JIT, yet they stand in a way. While this could be solved (with some headache, I suspect), C is far simpler and function calls or manipulating structs are actually trivial... Regards, Tomasz Rola -- ** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. ** ** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home ** ** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... ** ** ** ** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com ** -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
