In article <4c2e79d3$0$1663$742ec...@news.sonic.net>, John Nagle <na...@animats.com> wrote: >On 7/2/2010 3:00 PM, Aahz wrote: >> In article<4c2e38f5.10...@animats.com>, John Nagle<na...@animats.com> wrote: >>> >>> 5. Get at least two major hosting services to put up Python 3. >> >> webfaction.com has python3.1 > > Any user can install Python 3.x, but it's not there by default.
Yes, it is. I logged into my webfaction shell, typed python3.1, and got a standard Python prompt, without doing anything whatsoever to make Python 3.1 available. > "http://blog.webfaction.com/python-3-0-is-here"; Is there some reason you're using a broken URL format? > If that approach catches on, Python 3 deployment will be much easier. >But for now, only a few smaller players like WebFaction are using it. In the hosting space that makes Python available, WebFaction is hardly a smaller player. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "If you don't know what your program is supposed to do, you'd better not start writing it." --Dijkstra -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
