On 06/30/10 01:25, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> But if so why setattr() still exists? What is it for if we can do the >> same thing via assignments? Also, in order to be perfect, Python should >> accept to add dynamic attributes dynamically, something like PEP >> 363. That doesn't happen. > > Setattr and friends exist to work with dynamic attributes. >
Yeah, my point is why setattr() for dynamic attributes while assignments for static attributes? Why not unify them? > "The Perfect Language" does not exist, and never will. I'm not even > sure it could exist for a single person, let alone a group of people > with disparate needs, patterns of thought, etc. > Agreed, but at least, the reason why I am being against so many people here is also trying to make Python be more perfect with my understanding. Thanks! -- Live like a child, think like the god. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
