On 6/27/10 4:03 PM, eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:09 pm, "Martin v. Loewis"<mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote:
The same happened with other kinds of deprecations and removals through
the life of 2.x. Some applications where tied to a specific Python
release, or to a specific feature that had been deprecated. These either
needed to be ported, or dropped.
Regards,
Martin
It should be easier to have a large number of python versions on one
machine... I am realy fond of 2.5 so I am probily going to start
compiling them or just include the python2.5 exe if I port stuff and
settle it that way..
Why do you think you'll need to compile anything?
I can't speak for the the people who run python.org, but considering you
can still get 1.5.2 in binary form for windows, I don't see why they'd
ever stop offering Python 2.5.
Just because new development for the 2.x series is coming to a halt,
doesn't mean anyone's forcing everyone to start using 2.6, 2.7, or 3.x,
or that suddenly Python.org is going to stop offering downloads for it.
There's just no reason for them to bother as long as there's any sort of
interest. I mean, ten years from now maybe if no one ever downloads 2.5
-- but as it is, its 11 years since 1.5.2 was released and no one seems
inclined to remove it. :)
--
... Stephen Hansen
... Also: Ixokai
... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io
... Blog: http://meh.ixokai.io/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
