In message <2010062422432660794-angrybald...@gmailcom>, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Why would I write this when SQLAlchemy, even without using its ORM > features, can do it for me? SQLAlchemy doesn’t seem very flexible. Looking at the code examples <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/examples.html>, they’re very procedural: build object, then do a string of separate method calls to add data to it. I prefer the functional approach, as in my table-update example. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
