On 6/14/10 7:22 PM, rantingrick wrote: > On Jun 14, 6:27 pm, Stephen Hansen <me+list/pyt...@ixokai.io> wrote: > >> From a functionality perspective, "pack" and "grid" are both distinctly >> less capable then wx sizers. > > Are you just flapping your gums or can you prove it Stephen? I will > accept any "Pepsi Challenge" you can muster in Wx code and echo that > same capability using Tkinter[1] in what will be no less than elegant > simplicity. So bring it on baby!
But, as to capabilities-- the ones I use not infrequently: - Shaped expansion: the control maintains its aspect ratio. - Fitting: The parent widget is resized so that it is the right size to contain all of its children widgets at their 'best' size (which is configured per-widget, and not per-column; min sizes on a column is insufficient). I absolutely adore this feature. - Alignment. If a widget is allocated 100x100 of space (due to proportion rules), but not set to expand, control over if it should center directly, or be aligned top-center or left-middle. - Spacers. As in a virtual 'widget' which takes up space but doesn't really exist. Yeah, you can just put some empty looking widget in there, but that's a hack. Still, this is only a nitpick. I'm not interested in dueling code, but capabilities. -- Stephen Hansen ... Also: Ixokai ... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io ... Blog: http://meh.ixokai.io/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
