On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2010-06-13 14:17 , Stefan Behnel wrote: >> >> Stephen Hansen, 13.06.2010 21:05: >>> >>> On 6/13/10 11:41 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>>> >>>> Take a look at a) NumPy and b) Cython. You can also use Cython with the >>>> array module, but NumPy is a much more common way to deal with "number >>>> crunching routines", especially multi-dimentional arrays. >>> >>> Does Cython support Py3k yet? The OP seemed to be concerned about using >>> numpy due to it not yet being ready for 3+. >> >> I didn't read that from the post, but you may be right. >> >> Cython supports Py 2.3-3.1+, but NumPy still does not support Py3k (they >> are actually considering to rewrite parts of it in Cython to simplify >> the migration ;). > > The latest SVN of numpy works in Python 3.1 already. There are still some > things to be fixed, but it's mostly done.
This is excellent news, thanks for pointing this out. Geremy Condra -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
