On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 16:58 -0700, rantingrick wrote: > We have a problem
No, we don't. Or at least, I don't. > """I don't use Tkinter so i don't care!"""" +1 > ... well just keep your negativity to yourself. When you have real > solutions or real ideas that could foster real solutions then for > Pete's sake bring them forth and let them be weighed in the balances > of truth. But i can tell you right now, everyone will have to > sacrifice something to get the perfect GUI for Python. And I'll be riding winged Unicorn's in New York's Time Square tomorrow. That's as likely as a "perfect GUI" (whatever that means). > Yes you heard > me correctly, the perfect GUI for Python! Not the perfect GUI for you, > me, or even xah lee! A "perfect GUI for Python" is just a nebulous fantasy. > There is a bright side, this is the best discussion i have witnessed > on this subject in two years (Probably due to fact that i did not > instigate the discussion). So the question is what should we do and > how should we do it? > - We can fix Tkinter by making it lean and mean. > - We can start fresh and really create something very Pythonic. > - We can do nothing and sit around for another two years complaining > like premenstrual Prima donna's. Option #4 - we can continue to very effectively develop solutions with the situation as it is. Witness the awesome Zeitgeist application in GNOME 3 - a GUI, developed in *gasp* Python. A real working solution that is part of a major project... Hmmmm. > So keep the ideas rolling in people. We need to hear from every side > of this forum. Meanwhile everyone who disagrees with you will be told "well just keep your negativity to yourself". So much for "every side". Signing out of this thread. -- Adam Tauno Williams <awill...@whitemice.org> LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
