On 07/06/2010 04:31, Carl Banks wrote:
On Jun 5, 7:22 pm, ant<shi...@uklinux.net> wrote:
I get the strong feeling that nobody is really happy with the state of
Python GUIs.
Tkinter is not widely liked, but is widely distributed. WxPython and
PyGtk are both
powerful, but quirky in different ways. PyQt is tied to one platform.
And there are
dozens more.
Whether or not we like graphics programming, it's not going to go
away. I get the
uneasy feeling whenever I start a new project that there should be a
'better' GUI
than the ones I currently use (WxPython and PyGtk).
Fragmentation is our enemy. Our resources are being dissipated. Is it
not time to
start again? We have shown that it is possible to do the right thing,
by creating Python3.
I ask the group; should we try to create a new GUI for Python, with
the following
properties?:
- Pythonic
- The default GUI (so it replaces Tkinter)
- It has the support of the majority of the Python community
- Simple and obvious to use for simple things
- Comprehensive, for complicated things
- Cross-platform
- Looks good (to be defined)
- As small as possible in its default form
If so, what are the next steps?
The Python SIG on GUIs closed years ago. Should that be revived?
This is "A Modest Proposal" (J. Swift). In a sense, I am suggesting
that
we eat our own babies.
But don't we owe it to the community?
Speaking for myself, PySide has resolved this issue for me. I used
PyQt for some things but didn't want to use it for everything because
of the license, but I'd be ok to use PySide for anything. It's
portable to the major systems and generally better (IMHO) than the
other toolkits.
Carl Banks
Carl,
Thanks for mentioning PySide, if I'd ever heard about it I'd forgotten.
To OP.
See the following link as to why you've got so many comments:)
http://www.symbian-freak.com/news/009/08/first_public_release_of_pyside_for_qt_and_maemo.htm
Kindest regards.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
