Vincent Davis wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us
<mailto:et...@stoneleaf.us>> wrote:
Do you expect afoo.letter[x] to always be afoo.x? Because they aren't:
>>> afoo.A = 9
>>> afoo.letter['a']
1
What you are pointing out is that the assignment is not reversed . But
that does make me thing of something I had not.
>>> afoo.letter['a'] = 345
>>> afoo.A
1
Thats kinda a bummer, whats a good way to make sure affo.A gets updated?
It's possible, and not too tough, but... why do you need it done that
way? Keeping redundant information seems like extra work with no advantage.
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
