Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2010 06:24:04 -0700, Ed Keith wrote:
--- On Thu, 5/13/10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
What have you got against LGPL for this purpose? --
Most of my clients would not know how to relink a program if their life
depended on it. And I do not want to put then in DLL hell. So I avoid
the LGPL.
Are you implying that by distributing your libraries under the MIT or
Apache licence, no linking is required? That's a cool trick, can you
explain how it works please?
I believe he is implying that with MIT or Apache, he is able to do all
the compiling/linking/generating himself, thus saving his customers the
effort.
You're a smart man, Steven, surely you could have figured that out? ;)
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
