--- On Thu, 5/13/10, Patrick Maupin <pmau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Patrick Maupin <pmau...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Picking a license
> To: python-list@python.org
> Date: Thursday, May 13, 2010, 11:45 PM
> On May 13, 10:06 pm, Lawrence
> D'Oliveiro <l...@geek-
> central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
> > In message <mailman.141.1273767256.32709.python-l...@python.org>,
> Ed Keith
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Assertion I:
> > > If person A is free to do more than person
> B, then person A has
> > > more freedom then person B.
> >
> > > Assertion II:
> > > If person A is free do perform an action
> person B is not free to
> > > perform then person A is free to do more
> than person B.
> >
> > > Assertion III:
> > > If person B is restricted in some way that
> person A is not them Person A
> > > is free to do something Person B is not free
> to do.
> >
> > > Conclusion:
> > > If person B is more resticted than Peston A,
> Person A has mor freedom
> > > than person B.
> >
> > > Which step in this reasoning do you disagree
> with?
> >
> > Under the GPL, everybody has exactly the same
> freedoms. So which of your
> > assertions is supposedly a criticism of the GPL?
>
> That's absolutely not true. For a start, the original
> author can dual-
> license. This is not a theoretical issue -- it is a
> multi-million
> dollar issue.
>
> Regards,
> Pat
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
Everyone I personally know who has released code under the GPL either
dual-licenses, or hopes to.
-EdK
Ed Keith
e_...@yahoo.com
Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
