In message <pan.2010.05.11.20.07.09.579...@nowhere.com>, Nobody wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 23:13:10 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >>> But the beauty is that Python is multi-paradigm ... >> >> The trouble with “multi-paradigm” is that it offends the zealots on >> all sides. > > Is that how you view people who like languages to exhibit a degree of > consistency? Interesting, I never knew “consistency” was a synonym for “faith”... > Some people would prefer to have a manageable set of rules > rather than having to remember the results of all of the possible > combinations of interactions between language features. What are you accusing Python of, exactly? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list