"Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hell...@dcuktec.org> writes: > I fail to see what is morally wrong with it. When I ,as the author, > share my work to the public, I should have made peace with the fact > that I, for all intends and purposes, lost control over its use.
Does the same thing apply to Microsoft? If I get a copy of MS Office, do you think I should be able to incorporate its code into my own products for repackaging and sale any way that I want, without their having any say? If not, why should Microsoft be entitled to do that with software that -I- write? Is there something in the water making people think these inequitable things? If Microsoft's licenses are morally respectable then so is the GPL. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
