On 04/17/10 03:40, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: > Lie, > >> Does it makes sense to be able to install a library in other's computer, but >> not redistribute it? Hmm... I'll have to consult a lawyer. > > See Tim Robert's response (I can't remember which Python mailing list) >
I was responding to Alex Hall's comment (and your subsequent reply) """ pyt...@bdurham.com wrote: > Alex Hall wrote: >> I do not see anything about redistribution, only >> installation, unless I am missing something? > I read "installation" to mean the same as "redistribution" in the > context of this article. Perhaps I'm wrong? """ it appears to me *if* someone had written an EULA that allows installation on other machine but not redistributing it, they must be fairly insane (in this case, Microsoft isn't insane enough to write such EULA for their VC). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
