> > I naively thought I could capture output from exec()'ed print > > invocations by (somehow) overriding 'print' globally. But this > > seems not to be possible. <snip>
> > old_print = __builtins__.print > __builtins__.print = printhook > yield > __builtins__.print = old_print I'm pretty sure this is semantically equivalent to my original code, but I gave it a try anyway. FWIW, it doesn't work, either. :-} > But you really should replace sys.stdout and sys.stderr instead. I'm starting to believe it, but... I thought that one of the benefits of making print a function was that it *could* be globally replaced. So far I've had no luck injecting a custom print replacement into other modules. Is this really not possible? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
