On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Paul Rubin <no.em...@nospam.invalid> wrote: [...] > > d[r] = list(r for r in [4,5,6]) >
This have a slightly performance difference. I think mainly the generator's next() call. In [1]: %timeit list(r for r in range(10000)) 100 loops, best of 3: 2.78 ms per loop In [2]: %timeit [r for r in range(10000)] 100 loops, best of 3: 1.93 ms per loop ~Rolando -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
