On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:49:04 +0000, "John P." <mailingli...@riddergarn.dk> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:22:04 -0500, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <da...@druid.net> > wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:56:12 +0000 >> "John P." <mailingli...@riddergarn.dk> wrote: >>> Sorry but its not really an option for me with PostgreSQL. Thanks > anyway. >> >> Why? It's your best option. Any other solutions that you can't use >> before people give you more suggestions? > > Chill. I didn't ask for an alternative to my database, it could be writing > in a file as well. What I need is some kind of queue to my function so it > doesnt crack up running 20 times at the same time. I'm working on a remote > server which I share with some friends, meaning I can't install whatever I > want to. > The problem seems to be that my threads are making MySQL queries at the > same time before it can fetch the data just requested. Also I said thanks > for his effort trying to help and kept a nice tone, shouldn't that be > enough? > > /John
Don't worry guys, I found a solution. My problem was caused because I used the same mysql connection for all the treads, now its working perfectly, with mysql. /John. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
