Patrick Maupin wrote:
On Mar 1, 12:03 pm, Paul Rubin <no.em...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
But you are working on a solution in search of a problem. The really
smart thing to do would be pick something more useful to work on. We
don't need another configuration language. I can't even say "yet
another" because there's already a "yet another" called yaml.
The only "in search of" here is that, instead of working on a point
solution for my particular problem, I am "in search of" a solution
that is a bit more elegant and general, and that might help solve
other people's problems too. If you are not one of those that has
this sort of problem at this point in time, then feel free to kill-
file this thread.
Psst. That you're allowed to present the idea that you think is good
doesn't mean that other people aren't allowed to respond and point out
that in their opinion it's not such a good idea. You don't own this or
any other thread.
--
Erik Max Francis && m...@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM/Y!M/Skype erikmaxfrancis
It's better to be quotable than to be honest.
-- Tom Stoppard
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
