On Feb 17, 12:02 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@geek- central.gen.new_zealand> wrote: > In message > <8ca440b2-6094-4b35-80c5-81d000517...@v20g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, > > Jonathan Gardner wrote: > > I used to think anonymous functions (AKA blocks, etc...) would be a > > nice feature for Python. > > > Then I looked at a stack trace from a different programming language > > with lots of anonymous functions. (I believe it was perl.) > > Didn’t it have source line numbers in it? > > What more do you need?
I don't know, but I tend to find the name of the function I called to be useful. It's much more memorable than line numbers, particularly when line numbers keep changing. I doubt it's just me, though. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
