On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Steven D'Aprano < ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> > security aspects I guess it would also not be much use, is this correct? > > Absolutely 100% wrong. It is an fundamental principle of security that > you must not assume that the enemy is ignorant of your procedures. > "Security by obscurity" is not security at all. > > See, for example: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerckhoffs'_Principle > > I believe, the use of work 'security' wasn't the best choice to describe the need, if I understand the original poster's intentions. The intentions of original poster were "intellectual property protection", where-in they have indeed created something worth stealing, and would like to put it under lock-n-key. For that purpose, I do not think Python is the right choice. BTW for people who are non-believers in something being worth stealing needing protection, need to read about the Skype client. -- regards, Banibrata http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdutta http://twitter.com/edgeliving
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
