Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
Shashwat Anand wrote:
LOL
pow(funny, sys.maxint)
Yes, funny, but it overlooks the point that Xah is a nuisance to
multiple communities, not just to ours, and quite often concurrently.
I'm all in favor of tolerance, but I'd like to see some evidence that
rehabilitation is practical before the community has to tolerate too
much of that kind of nonsense.
regards
Steve
Actually for one Xah post I get, I then get 20 mails complaining about
him. The fact is, for someone like me who subscribed only to the python
list (what's the purpose of subscribing the perl list when you know
about python existence btw :o) ), the real annoying spam comes from the
complains, not Xah. Speaking for myself, I may get 3 or 4 posts from Xah
a month at most. Something I can live with.
So guys, just ignore him if you don't like him. Mailers & news readers
have plenty of feature to make it happen.
Adding my contribution to complains...
Alternatively, add [XAH] to the subject in the replies so that they can
be filtered out easily. :-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
