On Feb 6, 7:59 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
En Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:45:30 -0300, Frank Millman <fr...@chagford.com> escribió:
[...]
> However, the queue is not empty - it still has the final None in it. Yes - but who cares? :)
That was my point. I didn't think I needed to care, but I wanted to be sure I was not missing something.
I will just discard all the final cleanup code.
(BTW, I'd use a different sentinel instead of None; perhaps this could not happen in your current code, but it's easy to inadvertedly put a None in the queue, stopping all workers prematurely.)
Good advice. Thanks, Gabriel Frank -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
