Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> writes: > I prefer Guido's formulation (which, naturally, I can't find a direct > quote for right now): if you expect that a boolean argument is only > going to take *literal* True or False, then it should be split into > two functions.
So rather than three boolean arguments, would you have eight functions? -- Arnaud -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
