Don't the results look suspicious to you? Try measuring with
iterator = iter([])
You are obviously right, my brain doesn't work well today :-(
But the corret results even more distinctly support my thesis -- that for
n=None using n=sys.maxint (consume3) is noticeably faster than 0-maxlen
deque (consume1 and consume2):
consume0
10: 4.06217813492
100: 8.45529103279
1000: 53.237226963
None: 54.0063519478
consume1
10: 2.59927105904
100: 3.47109603882
1000: 12.7196500301
None: 26.0995740891
consume2
10: 2.36225390434
100: 3.22979712486
1000: 12.5794699192
None: 28.5096430779
consume3
10: 2.39173388481
100: 3.43043398857
1000: 14.3361399174
None: 14.8560190201
Regards,
*j
--
Jan Kaliszewski (zuo) <z...@chopin.edu.pl>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
