* Lie Ryan:
On 01/15/10 05:42, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
I'm beginning to believe that you maybe didn't grok that simple procedure.
It's very very very trivial, so maybe you were looking for something
more intricate -- they used to say, in the old days, "hold on, this
proof goes by so fast you may not notice it!"
Since you said it's trivial, then...
You can't get it more trivial.
Nothing about you there. Just the information you are promoting. I don't
normally deal in innuendo and personal attacks. Though I do occasionally
get irritated by what I perceive to be hogwash. People who know me will
tell you, if I am wrong I will happily admit it.
There's a difference between an algorithm that you can implement, and
hogwash.
please prove your claim by writing that algorithm in code and post it in
this list. The program must accept a .wav file (or sound format of your
choice) and process it according to your algorithm and the output
another .wav file (or sound format of your choice) that sounds roughly
similar to the input file.
First, the (very very trivial) algorithm I posted does *not* do that: by itself
it represents a sine wave, not an arbitrary wave form.
And second I'm not about to write Fourier transform code to satisfy someone who
refuses to do a milligram of thinking.
The Fourier part stuff needed to do what you're requesting is non-trivial, or at
least it's some work to write the code.
PS: I have near-zero experience with sound processing
PPS: I will be equally delighted seeing either Steve admitting his wrong
or you admit your hogwash
PPPS: An alternative way to convince us is to provide a paper/article
that describes this algorithm.
PPPPS: Though I will be quite sad if you choose to reject the challenge
I don't believe any of what you write here.
Cheers & hth.,
- Alf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
