On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:06 AM, tanix <ta...@mongo.net> wrote: > In article > <53ec94c0-dbdd-4901-a46b-d7faee121...@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, > "johan.san...@gmail.com" <johan.san...@gmail.com> wrote: >>On Jan 13, 12:55=A0am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: >>> In article <1b42700d-139a-4653-8669-d4ee2fc48...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.= >>com>, >>> ikuta liu =A0<ikut...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >Is python not good enough? for google, enhance python performance is >>> >the good way better then choose build Go language? >>> >>> It is not at all clear that -- despite some comments to the contrary -- >>> the Go developers are intending to compete with Python. =A0Go seems much >>> more intended to compete with C++/Java. =A0If they're successful, we may >>> eventually see GoPython. =A0;-) >>> -- >>> Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <*> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http:/= >>/www.pythoncraft.com/ >>> >>> "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait >>> until you hire an amateur." =A0--Red Adair >> >>GoPython i think would be neat. > > Well, as soon as they restore the braces to identify the code > blocks and provide the functionality of advanced statically > type languages, such as threads, async processing, all synchronization > primitives, garbage collection, events and GUI, i'd be willing > to switch to Python. Some of it is already there. But not all. > > Except, before doing it, I'd like to know what Python buys me > compared to say Java.
The lack of knowledge shown here gives me even less confidence in your "Goldmine" collections than before. Cheers, Chris -- http://blog.rebertia.com > -- > Programmer's Goldmine collections: > > http://preciseinfo.org > > Tens of thousands of code examples and expert discussions on > C++, MFC, VC, ATL, STL, templates, Java, Python, Javascript, PHP, > organized by major topics of language, tools, methods, techniques. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
