Le Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:33:18 +0100, Roald de Vries a écrit : > > I'm using a database, and want to use python interactively to manipulate > it. On the other hand, I also want to be able to use it non- > interactively. In that case, it would be a waste of CPU to load the > function/class definitions meant for interactive use.
Why don't you write a separate writer script for the interactive behaviour? This would be much simpler than trying to guess whether the current Python process is "interactive", since the latter is ill-defined. Remember, explicit is better than implicit. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
