On Dec 16, 10:22 am, r0g <aioe....@technicalbloke.com> wrote: > Gabriel Rossetti wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > I'm going nuts with some regex, could someone please show me what I'm > > doing wrong? > > > I have an XMPP msg : > > <snip> > > > Does someone know what is wrong with my expression? Thank you, Gabriel > > Gabriel, trying to debug a long regex in situ can be a nightmare however > the following technique always works for me... > > Use the interactive interpreter and see if half the regex works, if it > does your problem is in the second half, if not it's in the first so try > the first half of that and so on an so forth. You'll find the point at > which it goes wrong in a snip. > > Non-trivial regexes are always best built up and tested a bit at a time, > the interactive interpreter is great for this. > > Roger.
I'll just add that the "now you have two problems" quip applies here, especially when there are very good XML parsing libraries for Python that will keep you from having to reinvent the wheel for every little change. See sections 20.5 through 20.13 of the Python Documentation for several built-in options, and I'm sure there are many community projects that may fit the bill if none of those happen to. Personally, I consider regular expressions of any substantial length and complexity to be bad practice as it inhibits readability and maintainability. They are also decidedly non-Zen on at least "Readability counts" and "Sparse is better than dense". Intchanter Daniel Fackrell P.S. I'm not sure how any of these libraries are implemented yet, but I'd hope they're using a finite state machine tailored to the parsing task rather than using regexes, but even if they do the latter, having that abstracted out in a mature library with a clean interface is still a huge win. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
