On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 4, 12:46 pm, geremy condra <debat...@gmail.com> wrote: > more common than full-blown graph package). >> Sure, its a tree, which is also a graph. In this case it looks to >> me more like a directed acyclic graph than anything, but its >> pretty much just semantics since the interface is functionally >> equivalent. > > I'd have to agree with Lie, yes a tree is a graph, but it's simply not > an argument that Python community is grasping for graph structures. > It's like arguing that the Python community could benefit from a > quaternion type, because quaternions are actually heavily used in > Python, because a scalar number is a quarternion.
Fair enough. I suspect that other examples could be provided easily enough that I'm not going to fight over that one. > Carl Banks > > (Would be +1 on a good graph implementation... just not because of > ElementTree.) I'd love it if you'd take a look at Graphine and see whether it would meet the standard for a good graph implementation. Geremy Condra -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
