On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, inhahe <inh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Lie Ryan <lie.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12/2/2009 10:26 AM, allen.fowler wrote: >>> >>> I've tried this, but have found two issues: >>> >>> 1) I can't set default values. >>> 2) I can't set required values. >>> >>> In both of the above cases, if the object is created without the >>> "exact" dict() I expect, all the assumption my methods make about what >>> is available in "self" fall apart. >>> >> > > def __init__(self, required1, required2, default1='d1', default2='d2', > **kwargs): > for par in kwargs: > self.setattr(par, kwargs[par]) > self.required1 = required1 > self.required2 = required2 > self.default1 = default1 > self.default2 = default2 > > or > > def __init__(self, required1, required2, default1='d1', default2='d2', > **kwargs): > for par in kwargs: > self.setattr(par, kwargs[par]) > self.required1 = required1 > self.required2 = required2 > self.default1 = default1 > self.default2 = default2 >
(sorry, sent the same code twice. i was going to do it a different way and realized it would be too magically) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
