On 27 Nov, 12:18, boblatest <boblat...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> (sorry for posting from Google. I currently don't have access to my
> normal nntp account.)
>
> Here's my question: Given a list of onknown length, I'd like to be
> able to do the following:
>
> (a, b, c, d, e, f) = list
>
> If the list has fewer items than the tuple, I'd like the remaining
> tuple elements to be set to "None". If the list is longer, I'd like
> the excess elements to be ignored.
>
> The code snippet below does what I want, I was just wondering if there
> was an interesting "Pythonic" way of expressing the same thing.
>
> Thanks,
> robert
>
> def iter_inf(li, n):
> for i in range(n):
> if i < len(li):
> r = li[i]
> else:
> r = None
> i += 1
> yield r
>
> li = ['a', 'b', 'c']
> (a, b, c, d, e) = iter_inf(li, 5)
> print a, b, c, d, e
An alternative to Peter's itertools implementation is this
monstrosity...
import re
class name_elements:
def __init__(self, iterable, *names):
self.__names = set(names)
if len(self.__names) != len(names):
raise ValueError('names must be unique')
for it, name in zip(iterable, names):
if not re.match('[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*', name):
raise ValueError("name '%s' is not valid" % name)
setattr(self, name, it)
def __getattr__(self, item):
if item not in self.__names:
raise ValueError("name '%s' not present" % item)
return self.__dict__.get(item, None)
>>> res = name_elements(['a', 'b', 'c'], 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e')
>>> print res.a, res.b, res.c, res.d, res.e
a b c None None
>>> print res.f
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#23>", line 1, in <module>
print res.f
File "/home/jon/rubbish.py", line 10, in __getattr__
raise AttributeError("name '%s' not present" % item)
AttributeError: name 'f' not present
It removes the need to know the number being unpacked (I can see this
being overlooked) and the variable names could come from a list
instead of being named in code. Asking for a name that doesn't exist
is an exception, while all other values default to None.
However, it's not totally identical to unpacking... (and most likely
slower)
I s'pose namedtuple could also be abused in a similar fashion.
Or, if you don't mind []'ing:
>>> dd = defaultdict(lambda: None)
>>> dd.update(zip(['a', 'b', 'c'], range(5)))
>>> print dd['a'], dd['c'], dd['blah']
0 2 None
Is it obvious I'm trying to avoid doing proper work!?
Cheers,
Jon.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
