> >> Recently I was looking into distribution mechanisms, and I passed over > >> bbfreeze because I saw no indication that Python 2.6 was supported. > > > >Not sure if it's officially supported, but I do most of my development > >on Python 2.6 and bbfreeze hasn't given me any problems as yet. > > Also, bbfreeze doesn't seem to have active development.
It's slow but certainly active. Development was recently moved to github with almost no fanfare (in fact I only discovered the github site by accident): http://github.com/schmir/bbfreeze Out of curiosity, what freezer package did you settle on in the end? I'm curious it see if esky could easily switch between different freezers (although it currently depends on some rather deep details of the bbfreeze format). Cheers, Ryan -- Ryan Kelly http://www.rfk.id.au | This message is digitally signed. Please visit r...@rfk.id.au | http://www.rfk.id.au/ramblings/gpg/ for details
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
