On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:00:09 -0800, Carl Banks wrote: >> as has been posted before and again in a slightly different form in >> Steve's post. > > I'm well aware of it, but I didn't think the proposal deserved to be > called stupid when it was a reasonable solution to a real need, even > though a workable and less intrusive option exists.
Fair enough, I was feeling grumpy at the time. Perhaps "stupid" was unfair. Perhaps. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
