On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 16:31, Daniel Fetchinson <fetchin...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> This is a *really* bad idea. > > How do you know for sure? Maybe the OP wants to use this thing with 3 > known researchers working on a cluster that is not even visible to the > outside world. In such a setup the model the OP suggested is a > perfectly reasonable one. I say this because I often work in such an > environment and security is never an issue for us. And I find it > always amusing that whenever I outline our code to a non-scientist > programmer they always run away in shock and never talk to us again :) > Nevertheless our code works perfectly for our purposes.
It is a bad idea because that's exactly why we now have a spam problem. It _was_ a trusted environment once upon a time. Just check your spam messages to see why ignoring security can lead to really bad results. Do you know for sure that in say 3-5 years from now on your software isn't released into the wild and then has no security at all? regards, Martin -- http://www.xing.com/profile/Martin_Marcher http://www.linkedin.com/in/martinmarcher You are not free to read this message, by doing so, you have violated my licence and are required to urinate publicly. Thank you. Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
