Il Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:04:45 -0700, ryles ha scritto: > On Oct 28, 7:02 pm, mattia <ger...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Now, I would like to know the activity done (e.g. every two seconds) so >> I create another thread that checks the queue size (using .qsize()). >> Have you any suggestion to improve the code? > > It's not uncommon to pass each thread a second queue for output, which > in your case might be tuples of (item, result). You can read from this > queue in a single thread, and since the results now accumulate > incrementally, you can easily collect more detailed status/progress > information (if that's what you're looking for).
OK, but what do you mean by 'read from this queue'? I mean, I can have a variable initialized when the working queue is full (e.g. ready to be used) and then every time i use queue.get() decrement the variable (using a lock in order to prevent concurrent access). Is what you had in mind? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
