Steven D'Aprano <ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au> writes: > But the consequence of that simplicity and speed is that they're not as > general as a for-loop. This was a design decision. But change the design > and you could have something like this: > > [expr for name in seq until cond] > > which breaks when cond becomes true.
from itertools import takewhile xs = [expr(name) for name in takewhile(lambda s: not cond(s), seq)] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
