On 2005-04-29 Diez Roggisch wrote: > Take qt if you can - the upcoming version qt4 will be GPLed for windows > (which means better binary support for windows), but recently the qt3 x11 > free edition got adapted to windows. I use that myself, and have to say > that I'm pretty impressed - apart from some real minor glitches (e.g. the > date entry widget shows some highlighting problems) things work smooth. And > qt is a fantastic toolkit. And very well worth the money you have to buy it > - the time and effort saved using a well-designed orthogonal toolkit will > make the cost amortise pretty quick. Especially when used in conjunction > with PyQt.
I'm surprised that Trolltech is allowing Microsoft to get their product for free. I have played with Qt3 somewhat; not sure how their widgetry compares with GTK+, as far as looks are concerned, but much prefer C++. Disappointingly, the openGL module for QT failed to work when I ran the examples. I hear VTK is nice. Just checked Google and, sure enough, there's a pyVTK. On 2005-04-28 Lee Harr wrote: > How about the blender web plugin? > http://www.blender.org/modules/bc2002/plugin.html > > I am not sure the plugin has been updated to match > recent blender releases, but recent blenders offer > python scripting. Could be interesting anyhow. Blender looks impressive too, but do I have to learn how to program with mozilla? I feel like a bee who cannot decide on which flower to light. Anyway, thanks to you all for the input. Mike E -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
