On Sep 25, 4:26 pm, Aaron Watters <aaron.watt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks. I just modified the WHIFF concepts index page > > http://aaron.oirt.rutgers.edu/myapp/docs/W1000.concepts > > To include the following paragraph with a startling and arrogant > claim in the final sentence :) > > """ > Developers build WHIFF applications much like they build > static web content, PHP applications, JSP pages, or ASP > pages among others -- the developer "drops" files into a > directory, and the files are automatically used to respond > to URLs related to the filename. > **This intuitive and ubiquitous approach to organizing > web components is not automatically supported by other > WSGI infrastructures.** > """ > > [I go on to illustrate the concept with examples...] > > Is the final sentence true? Are there other WSGI approach > which make deploying a dynamic page as easy as putting > an HTML file in a static directory? If I'm lying I'd like to > correct the statement and my knowledge of what else is out > there is faulty and incomplete, so please correct me. > > Thanks, -- Aaron Watters
To me, it looks like the approach Quixote used long before the coming of WSGI (see http://www.quixote.ca/learn/1 "How Quixote Works"). M.S. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
