> Makes sense to me. To step through what's happening: > > >>> A.n, B.n > (0, 0) > > Here, the lookup on B.n fails (that is, B itself has no variable n), > and thus falls back to A.n
See, this is what tripped me up, right at the beginning. I thought B would inherit (as in copy) the variable n from A. Can you point out to me which part (or parts) of the Language Reference says this is the way it's supposed to be? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
