Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> writes: > In particular, because there is no indication that it is an exact > duplicate of what I will also find on the list itself. Please use > reply instead of reply-all.
Better: If you don't want to reply to the author directly, and you don't want to reply to everyone, don't use “reply to author” or “reply to all”. When replying to the list, use the “reply to list” command of your mail client. This will, in a standards-compliant mail client, reply to the posting address for the list (declared in the message header via the RFC 2369 ‘List-Post’ field, added automatically by every common mailing list system), without a copy to the sender. Thunderbird has a long-outstanding bug report requesting this feature <URL:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45715>, which is apparently fixed in recent versions. Before that bug was fixed, an add-on <URL:http://www.juergen-ernst.de/addons/replytolist.html> was developed to add it in a different way. If you're using a different mail client, look for the “reply to list” command, and if it's not there (or doesn't work correctly), report it to the vendor as a bug and/or switch to one of the many alternative MUAs that get it right. -- \ “I think it would be a good idea.” —Mahatma Gandhi (when asked | `\ what he thought of Western civilization) | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
