On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:23:57PM -0700, James Harris wrote: > You misunderstand. I was saying that taking a leading zero as > indicating octal is archaic. Octal itself is fine where appropriate.
I don't see that the leading zero is any more archaic than the use of octal itself... Both originate from around the same time period, and are used in the same cases. We should just prohibit octal entirely then. But I suppose it depends on which definition of "archaic" you use. In the other common sense of the word, the leading zero is no more archaic than the C programming language. Let's ban the use of all three. :) (I believe C is still the language in which the largest number of lines of new code are written, but if not, it's way up there.) > The chmod command doesn't require a leading zero. No, but it doesn't need any indicator that the number given to it is in octal; in the case of the command line tool, octal is *required*, and the argument is *text*. However, the chmod() system call, and the interfaces to it in every language I'm familiar with that has one, do require the leading zero (because that's how you represent octal). Including Python, for some 20 years or so. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
pgpf8DJDYdSjx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
