On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:14:10 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: >> If the question was "Why is there no 'or' operator ?", would "because >> A or B <=> not(not A and not B)" be a proper answer ? > > Note that in Python A or B is in fact not equivalent to not(not A and > not B).
Ah, but it *is* "equivalent"; it isn't "identical", but that's not the point. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
